-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 196
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Artifacts in spiral cone-beam CT reconstruction #622
Comments
It just looks like you have made a small mistake in the geoemtry, for example it could be that the direction of the angles should be the opposite, most likely (due to the moon shaped artifacts) |
100% the issue is a geometric mismatch, those arcs only happen like that. Angles=-angles |
Great! Glad it worked. For a small pitch fdk kinda works in helical, but I would not trust the quantitative values too much |
@AnderBiguri Hello
I tried to reconstruct the spiral cone beam CT image using an iterative reconstruction algorithm (SART, OS-SART), as I understand it only the geo.offOrigin parameter needs to be modified to synchronize the position of the bed at each angle, and the other parameters are almost unchanged, but I get the following image, which has scimitar-like artifacts in the image;
In fact, I found that it should not be a problem occurring in the projection process (Ax), it should be a problem occurring in the inverse projection process (Atb), in addition I did the same reconstruction directly using the FDK algorithm, and the result is the same as OS-SART, with the same artifacts.
the geo i used
The spiral trajectory is as follows
I also used these same geometric parameters for the sheppLogan3D simulation FDK reconstruction and the results show that the reconstructed sheppLogan image has no artifacts
the projections(two angles) is
the FDK recon image(one slice) is (there is no artifacts)
But the same geo used in real data, got the atifact results.
here is the OS-SART algorithm result(real data)
And here is the FDK result
Do you have any idea what this could be due to?
Specifications
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: