Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Which license should we chose ? #1

Open
brucellino opened this issue Dec 9, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Which license should we chose ? #1

brucellino opened this issue Dec 9, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@brucellino
Copy link
Contributor

This paper will of course be as open-access as you can get, but we need to provide an explicit license. I proposed initially


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Use this issue to track the discussion and make the choice.

@kinow
Copy link
Member

kinow commented Dec 9, 2014

Re-posting my comment from the channel:

kinow 9:38 AM I'm +0 to any open license, and +1 to permissive licenses. So whichever you guys decide I'm fine with it

I tend to almost always adopt a permissive license for code (IOW people can use the code and make money on it), similar to the licenses of Jenkins (MIT), Hadoop (Apache) and Redis (BSD). But I'm fine with other licenses too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants