Backstage Plugins strive to be self-contained, with as much functionality as possible residing within the plugin itself and its backend APIs. There will however always be a need for plugins to communicate outside of its boundaries, both with other plugins and the app itself.
Backstage provides two primary methods for plugins to communication across their
boundaries in client-side code. The first one being the createPlugin
API and
the registration hooks passed to the register
method, and the second one being
Utility APIs. While the createPlugin
API is focused on the initialization
plugins and the app, the Utility APIs provide ways for plugins to communicate
during their entire life cycle.
Each Utility API is tied to an ApiRef
instance, which is a global singleton
object without any additional state or functionality, its only purpose is to
reference Utility APIs. ApiRef
s are create using createApiRef
, which is
exported by @backstage/core
. There are many predefined Utility APIs defined in
@backstage/core
, and they're all exported with a name of the pattern
*ApiRef
, for example errorApiRef
.
To access one of the Utility APIs inside a React component, use the useApi
hook exported by @backstage/core
, or the withApis
HOC if you prefer class
components. For example, the ErrorApi
can be accessed like this:
import React, { FC } from 'react';
import { useApi, errorApiRef } from '@backstage/core';
export const MyComponent: FC<{}> = () => {
const errorApi = useApi(errorApiRef);
// Signal to the app that something went wrong, and display the error to the user.
const handleError = error => {
errorApi.post(error);
};
// the rest of the component ...
};
Note that there is no explicit type given for ErrorApi
. This is because the
errorApiRef
has the type embedded, and useApi
is able to infer the type.
Also note that consuming Utility APIs is not limited to plugins, it can be done
from any component inside Backstage, including the ones in @backstage/core
.
The only requirement is that they are beneath the AppProvider
in the react
tree.
The Backstage App is responsible for providing implementations for all Utility
APIs required by plugins. The example app in this repo registers its APIs inside
src/apis.ts. Here's an example of how to wire up
the ErrorApi
inside an app:
import {
ApiRegistry,
createApp,
alertApiRef,
errorApiRef,
AlertApiForwarder,
ErrorApiForwarder,
ErrorAlerter,
} from '@backstage/core';
const builder = ApiRegistry.builder();
// The alert API is a self-contained implementation that shows alerts to the user.
const alertApi = builder.add(alertApiRef, new AlertApiForwarder());
// The error API uses the alert API to send error notifications to the user.
builder.add(errorApiRef, new ErrorAlerter(alertApi, new ErrorApiForwarder()));
const app = createApp({
apis: apiBuilder.build(),
// ... other config
});
The ApiRegistry
is used to register all Utility APIs in the app and associate
them with ApiRef
s. It implements the ApiHolder
interface, which enables it
to provide an API implementation given an ApiRef
.
Note that our ErrorApi
implementation depends on another Utility API, the
AlertApi
. This is the method with which APIs can depend on other APIs, using
manual dependency injection at the initialization of the app. In general, if you
want to depend on another Utility API in an implementation of an API, you import
the type for that API and make it a constructor parameter.
Defining a custom implementation of a utility API is easy, you simply need to
export a class that implements
the target API, for example:
export class IgnoringErrorApi implements ErrorApi {
post(error: Error, context?: ErrorContext) {
// ignore error
}
}
The IgnoringErrorApi
would then be imported in the app, and wired up like
this:
builder.add(errorApiRef, new IgnoringErrorApi());
Note that the above line will cause an error if IgnoreErrorApi
does not fully
implement the ErrorApi
, as it is checked by the type embedded in the
errorApiRef
at compile time.
The pattern for plugins defining their own Utility APIs is not fully established
yet. The current way is for the plugin to export its own ApiRef
and type for
the API, along with one or more implementations. It is then up to the app to
import, and register those APIs. See for example the
lighthouse or
graphiql plugins for examples of this.
The goal is to make this process a bit smoother, but that requires work in other parts of Backstage, like configuration management. So it remains as a TODO. If you have more questions regarding this, or have an idea for an API that you want to share outside your plugin, hit us up in GitHub issues or the Backstage Discord server.
The ApiRef
instances mentioned above provide a point of indirection between
consumers and producers of Utility APIs. It allows for plugins and components to
depend on APIs in a type-safe way, without having a direct reference to a
concrete implementation of the APIs. The Apps are also given a lot of
flexibility in what implementations to provide. As long as they adhere to the
contract established by an ApiRef
, they are free to choose any implementation
they want.
The figure below shows the relationship between different Apps, that provide different implementations of the FooApi. Components within Plugins then access the FooApi via the fooApiRef.
The current method for connecting Utility API providers and consumers is via the
React tree using an ApiProvider
, which is added to the AppProvider
of the
App
. In the future there may potentially be more ways to do this, in ways that
are not tied to react. A design goal of the Utility APIs was to not have them
directly tied to React.
The indirection provided by Utility APIs also makes it straightforward to test
components that depend on APIs, and to provide a standard common development
environment for plugins. A proper test wrapper with mocked API implementations
is not yet ready, but it will provided as a part of @backstage/test-utils
. It
will provide mocked variants of APIs, with additional methods for asserting a
component's interaction with the API.
The common development environment for plugins is included in
@backstage/dev-utils
, where the exported createDevApp
function creates an
application with implementations for all core APIs already present. Contrary to
the method for wiring up Utility API implementations in an app created with
createApp
, createDevApp
uses automatic dependency injection. This is to make
it possible to replace any API implementation, and having that be reflected in
dependents of that API.