Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to run TRENDY type simulations on mainline CTSM #2675

Open
4 of 9 tasks
ekluzek opened this issue Aug 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
4 of 9 tasks

Ability to run TRENDY type simulations on mainline CTSM #2675

ekluzek opened this issue Aug 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability science Enhancement to or bug impacting science usability Improve or clarify user-facing options

Comments

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Aug 1, 2024

In past years for TRENDY simulations we've had a branch where we created the surface/landuse datasets and to also run the simulations. The changes needed for TRENDY simulations are the following:

  1. Simulation start date of 1700 rather than 1850
  2. CRUJRA forcing data
  3. New surface/landuse datasets
  4. Other specialized datasets such as for ndep and others

The first three are the things that we want to make easier.

Definition of Done:

@ekluzek ekluzek added enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability tag: enh - new science labels Aug 1, 2024
@ekluzek ekluzek added this to the ctsm6.0.0 (code freeze) milestone Aug 1, 2024
@samsrabin samsrabin added science Enhancement to or bug impacting science and removed enh - new science labels Aug 8, 2024
@ekluzek ekluzek added the usability Improve or clarify user-facing options label Aug 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability science Enhancement to or bug impacting science usability Improve or clarify user-facing options
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants