Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

F+S08(a-d): need clearer definitions #5

Open
daniwelter opened this issue Sep 21, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

F+S08(a-d): need clearer definitions #5

daniwelter opened this issue Sep 21, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
feedback: indicator Feedback received for FAIRplus indicators

Comments

@daniwelter
Copy link
Collaborator

The description of the overall indicator (F+S08) seems to make a distinction between structured metadata and machine-readable metadata without clarifying what is meant by this (this whole point of structuring metadata is to make it machine readable). It also talks about common vocabularies. Neither concept (structured metadata or vocabularies) are revisited in the sub-indicators. This should be clarified.

There is a lot of overlap between indicator a, b and c. In particular, data processing and analyses methods are generally considered to be experimental protocols and should therefore be covered under indicator a. If indicator a is intended to only focus on sample collection and sample processing (in vivo/vitro) steps of a study while c focuses on the in silico aspects, this needs to be clarified

@oyadenizbeyan oyadenizbeyan added the feedback: indicator Feedback received for FAIRplus indicators label Oct 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feedback: indicator Feedback received for FAIRplus indicators
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants