Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Start using AssertJ in unit tests #1041

Closed
cowtowncoder opened this issue Jun 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Start using AssertJ in unit tests #1041

cowtowncoder opened this issue Jun 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
2.16 Issue planned (at earliest) for 2.16

Comments

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Currently unit test use basic JUnit (mostly v4 but some v5 starting to be used). While functional, there are some nice alternatives/extensions, like AssertJ:

https://github.com/assertj/assertj

Since this is not an either/or thing, we can mix and match: so let's add a dependency here in jackson-core first: with default version specified in one of parent poms (version property in oss-parent, managed dependency version set in jackson-base) and then individual modules adding as dependency as required.
@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder added the 2.16 Issue planned (at earliest) for 2.16 label Jun 3, 2023
cowtowncoder added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2023
@cowtowncoder
Update release notes wrt #1041: use of AssertJ (included with earlier…
832b520 
… commit)
@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member Author

Was done in an earlier commit, just updated release notes today.

@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder mentioned this issue Jun 3, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
2.16 Issue planned (at earliest) for 2.16
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@cowtowncoder