Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Static search trees (S+) index #8388

Open
EPluribusUnum opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Static search trees (S+) index #8388

EPluribusUnum opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@EPluribusUnum
Copy link

Hi *!

https://curiouscoding.nl/posts/static-search-tree/

You could build a more efficient index than B-tree for an immutable dataset.
With immutable table (#8387) this would be possible to implement.

@TommiPrami
Copy link
Contributor

This sounds good, but it also seems too good to be true.

It would be great to hear what the Engine developers think about this. If, and that's a big if, those numbers are even close to being accurate, it could be useful to have a separate index for static tables.

I was thinking that if this could really improve performance, it might be possible to set up certain database tables as static or very static. The index could then be created in memory at runtime.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants