You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I use TVR´s that control thermoelectric valves of a Floor Heating system which I think is a pretty common use case.
The TVR can only switch On/Off. The Floor heating has a delay of 8 hours. So basically it is kind of impossible to control it that way.
My proposal would be to use PWM to control the PVR.
So that would mean that BT uses a PID controller and the output of the PID is translated to Pulse and Pauses. So if the output of the PID is 50% the TVR would switch on for i.e. 10 Minutes (better adjustable) and then switch off for 10 Minutes (better adjustable). So I would only use 50% of the Heating capacity and avoid overshooting after 8 hours.
I think that would help a lot to improve the control of such systems.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I use TVR´s that control thermoelectric valves of a Floor Heating system which I think is a pretty common use case.
The TVR can only switch On/Off. The Floor heating has a delay of 8 hours. So basically it is kind of impossible to control it that way.
My proposal would be to use PWM to control the PVR.
So that would mean that BT uses a PID controller and the output of the PID is translated to Pulse and Pauses. So if the output of the PID is 50% the TVR would switch on for i.e. 10 Minutes (better adjustable) and then switch off for 10 Minutes (better adjustable). So I would only use 50% of the Heating capacity and avoid overshooting after 8 hours.
I think that would help a lot to improve the control of such systems.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions