Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Notice types 25, 26, 27 and 28 + BT-105 (Procedure Type) + BT-136 (Direct Award Justification Code) #1114

Open
troa1 opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@troa1
Copy link

troa1 commented Jan 22, 2025

In notice types 25, 26, 27 and 28 (ex-ante direct award) one MUST (by directive) always state the reason for selecting the direct award procedure.

However in notices 25, 26, 27 and 28 it is currently possible to select any procedure type in field BT-105 thus bypassing field BT-136. Field BT-136 only becomes mandatory when "Negotiated without prior call for competition" in BT-105 is selected.

How this should work:

In notice types 25, 26, 27 and 28 the only logically possible procedure type is "Negotiated without prior call for competition". Eliminate all other procedure types from these notice types (i.e. in these notice types BT-105 can be omitted and set always to "Negotiated without prior call for competition"). Only this way we can get the reason field (BT-136) filled out.

@YvesJo YvesJo self-assigned this Jan 23, 2025
@YvesJo
Copy link
Contributor

YvesJo commented Jan 23, 2025

Thanks for reporting this. We will clarify this internally and adapt accordingly. I foresee to have this addressed with the next SDK version.

@YvesJo YvesJo added this to the SDK 1.14.0 milestone Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants