Detail view: References

[paulsonder]

User interfaces can be found here.

Please record any feedback that needs to be actioned before moving the Dev here.

For future requirements, let's capture in a separate ticket and prioritise accordingly.

[jamlung-ri]

Overall, this design is meeting a TON of the needs that I can think of. There are a lot of positive things in here, and I generally have some smaller bits of feedback that hopefully won't disrupt this design too much.

I don't have any additional comments for the Reference details tab, since I think it's displaying a lot of relevant info related to how the reference itself is built.

I added some comments related to the following things for the View Expansion tab:

• Clarifying what "Target concepts" means
• Adding some info for the "orphaned mappings" row
• Adding some information about what source got resolved for this reference. This one might require input from @snyaggarwal, since I'm hoping that the resolved source URL is available for references so that more info about that source can be queried.

[paulsonder]

@jamlung-ri The designs have been revised, could you take a look at let me know if your feedback has been addressed?

I removed 'Target Concepts' for now, I'm actually unsure what we're representing there, so let's discuss!

[jamlung-ri]

@paulsonder I had one other comment on there about selecting an expansion for the View Expansion tab. But overall this design is looking good. This might be one that would benefit from Jon's input too, but I think the overall structure is working well.

[paulsonder]

Is that handled with the Expansion picker design @jamlung-ri ?

[jamlung-ri]

I think so! If we can just build in a way to select a different expansion somewhere, then I think this design is in good shape.

If it helps, this window probably doesn't need the checkboxes that I see in the Expansion Picker design, but it doesn't hurt to leave them in either.