You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Support for different protein conformations in the protocol would be desirable for some of our users. for the Non Equilibrium Cycling or Switching this can be done just by allowing different protein conformations in the protocol. We are now forcing the protein component to be the same here.
As long as we have a protocol that allows for different protein conformations we should be good to go in terms of the code.
There are some concerns about bookkeeping that we might need to consider, for example what if there are big clashes or the conformational changes are "too big".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Support for different protein conformations in the protocol would be desirable for some of our users. for the Non Equilibrium Cycling or Switching this can be done just by allowing different protein conformations in the protocol. We are now forcing the protein component to be the same here.
As long as we have a protocol that allows for different protein conformations we should be good to go in terms of the code.
There are some concerns about bookkeeping that we might need to consider, for example what if there are big clashes or the conformational changes are "too big".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: