Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: standardise workflows using SciML's reusable workflows #293

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 20, 2024

Conversation

thazhemadam
Copy link
Member

Update the workflows in this repository to use SciML's reusable workflows.
This is part of a larger effort to standardise the SciML's CI workflows for more generic and common requirements, to keep the workflows uniform and easier to maintain.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.04%. Comparing base (37faf7b) to head (de0f934).
Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #293      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   61.53%   54.04%   -7.49%     
==========================================
  Files          46       46              
  Lines        1448     1667     +219     
==========================================
+ Hits          891      901      +10     
- Misses        557      766     +209     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Update this one? Then I'll merge

@thazhemadam thazhemadam force-pushed the at/use-reusable-workflows branch from de0f934 to 2d5d33f Compare June 19, 2024 09:15
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 9a9dfde into main Jun 20, 2024
5 of 7 checks passed
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the at/use-reusable-workflows branch June 20, 2024 11:29
@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Wait, is this setting the test groups correctly?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants