-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade Cura with the latest understanding of 3D printer physics #16284
Comments
There are a lot of things I don't understand. This is just another example. |
@GregValiant Flow Rate Compensation Factor as it is currently described isn't clear length of the bowden tube into account for calculating the advance. I searched for uses of it in Cura Engine and it is only used in LayerPlan.cpp https://github.com/Ultimaker/CuraEngine/blob/1c016a0bb618489048b79fba75b8aac7658b484b/src/LayerPlan.cpp#L1773 |
After being pointed here from my duplicate request (sorry again for not searching carefully enough), I would like to second this request about the maximum flow rate. As stated in my (now closed) ticket, there is another aspect justifying this request: Some material is limiting the extrusion rate (=flow) more strongly than others, for instance TPU can be printed usually only a lot slower than PLA due to its softness. This requires to reduce the printing speed not only to a much lower than usual speed, but also the speed will depend on the layer height and nozzle diameter. The same is true if one is limited by cooling capacity (e.g. when printing ABS, which is a lot hotter than PLA). The amount of heat to be transported away depends to a fairly good extend on the amount of hot material being extruded, so I have to print thicker layers slower, keeping the extrusion rate constant. Hence, it would be a great help, if Cura could select the speed based upon two speed limits. The currently available speed limit is designed to help with limited spatial accuracy, hence I can select different speed limits for outer walls, infill etc., since the acceptable tolerances are different. Being able to limit the extrusion speed separately would reduce the need for changing these speed settings constantly when switching materials, layer heights and nozzle diameters. On top of this this will be extra helpful when combining with the Material Settings plugin (https://marketplace.ultimaker.com/app/cura/plugins/fieldofview/MaterialSettingsPlugin). I would define the extrusion speed limit for each material while having the normal speed limits in place to ensure my printer moves precise enough when I want it to. In my opinion, this will be a very useful and convenient addition to Cura. PS: I have to admit I do not fully understand the description of the "Flow Rate Compensation Factor", but it sounds to me more like a compensation for extruder slippage to avoid under/over extrusion. This is not at all what we are talking about here. PPS: About the second point regarding the acceleration: In my opinion this would be handled better in the printer firmware, since ideally the acceleration should be reduced gradually during the ongoing move, depending on the momentary speed (which is changing due to the acceleration). This cannot really be done by the slicer. |
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Some of the Cura settings do not represent how the physics of printing actually works and therefore forces the user to modify these settings for different types of prints.
From the speedboat race, notably the results of 247printing and Nitram and in addition with the works of CNC-Kitchen and many others it is now understood that the maximum print speed depends of only 3 factors:
The actual physical speed of movement is not a limiting factor, setting the speed is not the causal parameter neither for limitation nor for quality.
If we review the limitations that affects the speed of a print, there is:
In addition some of the modern printers have very high dynamic capabilities meaning that they are mostly hitting the constraint on their capability to melt plastic.ie: they are volume flow rate limited.
So this is an important parameter to implement knowing that it is already available in Prusa slicer for a while and it is already calculated in Cura as we can display it but not control it.
I have been waiting for upgrades in this direction since I've seen it appear in Prusa slicer and heard it was in development here however I have recently realized that a change going in that direction had been rejected see: #5248 and Ultimaker/CuraEngine#1814, I can not understand for me it feels like rejecting the physics and not admitting that earth is round.
I implore you to bring Cura to the latest understanding of 3D printer physics.
Describe the solution you'd like
A slicer that stays up to date with the understanding of the physics.
Providing consistent prints with different or variable layer heights
Use the nozzle maximum flow rate as a constraint to limit speed
Use acceleration limitation as a function of speed.
Describe alternatives you've considered
The alternative is to keep the current settings and continue not being representative of physics and stay in the middle age of 3D printing.
Affected users and/or printers
All the users who want to use these parameters
Additional information & file uploads
Some key CNC-Kitchen videos on flow rate:
some key 247 Videos:
speed acceleration curves:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: