You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In this plot the prediction doesn't look as good because the error at k=0 is somewhat off, and that throws everything else off. If there is time, let's increase the sample from each model: numsims = 64.
If we had all the time in the world to finish this, we would fit the constant by taking the ratio of the mean error[k] divided by the formula (without the constant) and then average to get the best-fit value for the constant. But other things are higher priority now.
taumeta: 4
eta: 16
scale_window : 16
shift: 64
window_size: 1024
num_estimations: 18
len_trajectory: 2177
num_trajectories: 4
num_trajectorieslen_trajectory: 8708
NAIVE window_size * num_estimations 19456
BAYES window_size + num_estimationsshift 2176
numruns=8
num_trajectories (simulated) = 128
numsims = 32
num_trajs = 4
Deciles_Bayes_MM.pdf
Issue follows up on #31
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: