You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Minor point: sometimes you write $g(u)$ and sometimes $g^{-1}(u)$ with the same letter $u$. Later in Section 15.2 page 267, $u$ is the exposure.
More importantly, you say " $g(u) = \exp(u)$ transforms a continuous linear predictor $X_i \beta$ to a positive $\hat{y}_i$", which is true, but a few lines above you defined $g()$ as the link function $\hat{y} = g^{-1}(X\beta)$. Then top of page 264 you say " $g$ is the inverse logit".
(It would also help in this section to define $\hat{y}$ because you define all other terms, is it meant to be $E[y|X]$ ?)
Thanks !
Shira
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Minor point: sometimes you write$g(u)$ and sometimes $g^{-1}(u)$ with the same letter $u$ . Later in Section 15.2 page 267, $u$ is the exposure.
More importantly, you say "$g(u) = \exp(u)$ transforms a continuous linear predictor $X_i \beta$ to a positive $\hat{y}_i$ ", which is true, but a few lines above you defined $g()$ as the link function $\hat{y} = g^{-1}(X\beta)$ . Then top of page 264 you say " $g$ is the inverse logit".
(It would also help in this section to define$\hat{y}$ because you define all other terms, is it meant to be $E[y|X]$ ?)
Thanks !
Shira
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: