-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For cycle 17 #662
Comments
This compensation proposal is subject to the terms of DAO proposal 247 bisq-network/proposals#247 and will be paid from the special BTC multisig escrow to @oscarguindzberg as follows, pending DAO approval in Cycle 17 voting: USD: 10000 |
What means "0.01492537 BTC for comp req" ? |
that refers to the cost incurred by the Guarantor for coloring the BSQ since 1 BSQ requires 100 sats, which would have been incurred by Oscar if he created his own comp req like normal |
Ah true. Was surprised its that much but its correct. Printing money is not cheap these days ;-) |
InfoRead BSQ amount from summary: 1492537 ErrorsUnknown team specified: segwit |
InfoRead BSQ amount from summary: 1492537 ErrorsERROR: Total BSQ does not match the sum of line items:
|
@wiz If this is pending on approving a proposal on the DAO, will this issue produce a DAO submission? Should it be tagged as "For cycle 17"? |
Not sure what proposal @wiz was referring to that needs to pass the DAO voting as it was approved already without putting it to the DAO for voting. @chimp1984 is reviewing @oscarguindzberg work before anything is merged into master. |
It's not "pending" anything, it's "subject to the terms of" the linked proposal. See the proposal for the details. |
As per bisq-network/proposals#247 the Guarantor has created DAO proposal with TXID |
I am happy the BSQ going to the guarantor as per bisq-network/proposals#247 |
Issuance by Team:
Total Issuance: 14925.37 BSQ (equivalent to: 10000.00 USD) |
Closed as accepted |
Summary
14925.37
Contributions delivered
Context:
bisq-network/projects#42
bisq-network/proposals#247
Contributions in progress
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: