-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make available new HC Layers via WMS #19
Comments
@RobAndGo I've tested a couple of the new layers and I'm having trouble uploading them to geoserver, the error may be related to the projection, though I'm not 100% certain. The older layers do not seem to have this problem.
When I use gdalinfo on the file there is no projection data and there's also no .prj file that can be used. Do you have these files for these layers? |
Hmmm, I think last time I may have uploaded the original netcdf files to @luis-meteogrid and he converted them into geotiff files. I'll see if I can corrected the error with the geotiff files myself. @luis-meteogrid : What command did you use to convert the netcdf to geotiff? I am using gdal_translate. |
Thank you! If it takes too much time just leave it on hold, this task in not urgent, as stated by Pascal. |
@RobAndGo I've checked with my colleagues and they think it's better if you just send us the netcdf files, for them is very simple and straightforward to get the rasters with all the information needed. But, as I said, this is not a priority. |
Thank you!! That saves me a lot of work! :-) |
@RobAndGo there are a bunch of these layers for tropical nights already available on our geoserver: https://clarity.meteogrid.com/geoserver If you see something wrong, let us know. Also, let us know if the scale is off. |
And all layers (Summer Days, Hot Days and Tropical Nights) are available now. |
@RobAndGo I've been working with the hydrology layers that were uploaded to the FTP a couple of weeks ago and I have noticed a couple of things that I don't know if are as intended. I think you mentioned these layers had been created by someone else, so feel free to tag them in this issue so they may give us a better insight in the matter. Each of the netcdf files contains six bands that are simply named as value1, value2, ..., value6, is this as intended? It should be no problem but it will take a bit longer to process. I've tested one of the files (cout-yearmax_returnPeriod100_ref_EUR-44_rcp26_IMPACT2C_QM-EOBS_1971-2000_remap0.5.nc) and picked three of the bands (just to ensure that everything worked fine). You can see the result here: https://clarity.meteogrid.com/geoserver/europe/wms?service=WMS&version=1.1.0&request=GetMap&layers=europe%3Aoutput&bbox=-25.0%2C33.0%2C40.0%2C72.0&width=768&height=460&srs=EPSG%3A3035&format=application/openlayers#toggle Let me know if it looks ok so I can start processing all these layers. Thanks! |
This appears to show river flood information, but I'm not sure what the values/colours mean. This data has been produced from SMHI - perhaps @LenaStr would have more information. Is Yeshewa or Jorge Amorim on github? |
What is the status here? |
Can be closed? |
Yes, I think so as what I posted here would also apply to this issue. |
There are new Hazard indexes available that should be via METEOGRID Geoserver WMS and proper styling should be added. The respective HC Resources have to be added to the Data Package so that the new layers can be recognized by the HC Map Component.
Note : Those Layers are just informative and not used for impact calculation in EIMKAT. EMIKAT uses the Hazard Events Layers. Therefore this issue is currently put on hold until the most pressing tasks have been completed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: