Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Determine a better level of staleness or make configurable. #21

Open
bgood opened this issue Mar 17, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Determine a better level of staleness or make configurable. #21

bgood opened this issue Mar 17, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@bgood
Copy link
Collaborator

bgood commented Mar 17, 2021

Is it intentional to read using a 10 second exact staleness? While this could lead to lower read latency, it will by definition read 10 seconds old data. The default would be to use a strong read which is guaranteed to return all changes that have been committed, which is also one of the USP's of Spanner compared to storage systems that use eventual consistency. Another option here could also be to use a max staleness of 10 seconds, instead of exact staleness, and let Spanner choose the optimal read timestamp.

Originally posted by @olavloite in #3 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant