Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 31, 2024. It is now read-only.

Proposal: Using security group NAMEs instead of IDs #10

Open
aibou opened this issue Jan 29, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Proposal: Using security group NAMEs instead of IDs #10

aibou opened this issue Jan 29, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@aibou
Copy link
Contributor

aibou commented Jan 29, 2018

Hi there,

Currently, we have to write security group IDs such as:

security_groups(
  "sg-12345678",
  "sg-90abcdef",
)

It makes us confuse.
I think that most of users of the applb is using the piculet, they would not consider about security group IDs.
So I'll be happy when we could write security group name such as:

security_groups(
  "elb-foo",
  "http-from-my-house",
  "http-from-anywhere",
)

Is it acceptable to you? What do you think about it?

@wata-gh
Copy link
Collaborator

wata-gh commented Feb 7, 2018

Sounds good!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants