Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: remove 0 length check in pebble #23157

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

fix: remove 0 length check in pebble #23157

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

tac0turtle
Copy link
Member

@tac0turtle tac0turtle commented Jan 2, 2025

Description

Closes: #23133

remove 0 length check as iavl store 0 length rootkey value when there is nothing set in the store


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved database retrieval method by removing the check for empty results, allowing for more straightforward handling of data.
    • Removed support for the RocksDB backend, including related tests and dependencies.

These changes streamline the database operations and focus on the remaining supported backends, enhancing overall reliability.

@tac0turtle tac0turtle marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2025 16:24
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 2, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the Get method in the PebbleDB struct within the store/v2/db/pebbledb.go file. The change removes the previous conditional check that returned nil for empty byte slices retrieved from the database. Now, the method will return the byte slice directly, regardless of its length, while still ensuring the closer is closed after the operation. Additionally, support for the RocksDB backend has been entirely removed from the codebase, including its associated tests and dependencies.

Changes

File Change Summary
store/v2/db/pebbledb.go Modified Get method to remove empty byte slice handling
store/v2/commitment/store_bench_test.go Removed rocksdb build constraints and backend options
store/v2/db/db.go Removed DBTypeRocksDB constant and related switch case
store/v2/db/rocksdb.go Deleted entire RocksDB implementation and related methods
store/v2/db/rocksdb_noflag.go Deleted RocksDB struct and its methods
store/v2/db/rocksdb_test.go Removed test suite for RocksDB
store/v2/go.mod Removed dependency on github.com/linxGnu/grocksdb v1.9.3

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Fix PebbleDB configuration issue in app.toml [#23133] Unclear if this specific change resolves the entire database initialization problem

The change appears to be a small modification to the database retrieval method, but it may not comprehensively address the full error reported in the issue, which involves failing to get an immutable tree at version 1. More investigation might be needed to fully resolve the database backend configuration problem.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

C:x/accounts, C:x/distribution, C:x/consensus, C:x/epochs, C:x/slashing, C:x/staking, C:server/v2, C:indexer/postgres, C:server/v2 cometbft, backport/v0.52.x

Suggested reviewers

  • sontrinh16
  • kocubinski
  • julienrbrt
  • hieuvubk
  • testinginprod

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51bdb7a and 85d4e7c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • store/v2/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • store/v2/commitment/store_bench_test.go (0 hunks)
  • store/v2/db/db.go (0 hunks)
  • store/v2/db/rocksdb.go (0 hunks)
  • store/v2/db/rocksdb_noflag.go (0 hunks)
  • store/v2/db/rocksdb_test.go (0 hunks)
  • store/v2/go.mod (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (6)
  • store/v2/db/db.go
  • store/v2/db/rocksdb_test.go
  • store/v2/commitment/store_bench_test.go
  • store/v2/go.mod
  • store/v2/db/rocksdb_noflag.go
  • store/v2/db/rocksdb.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

@tac0turtle your pull request is missing a changelog!

@tac0turtle tac0turtle enabled auto-merge January 2, 2025 16:58
@tac0turtle tac0turtle added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 2, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 3d544c1 Jan 2, 2025
75 of 76 checks passed
@tac0turtle tac0turtle deleted the marko/23133 branch January 2, 2025 17:52
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 6, 2025
12 tasks
@robert-zaremba robert-zaremba mentioned this pull request Jan 7, 2025
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: pebbledb in app.toml doesn't work
4 participants