sample_dpmpp_2m slightly different from paper #48
patrickvonplaten
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
Maybe also cc @LuChengTHU does it matter a lot whether the timesteps finish at 0.0 or not? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
When debugging the
sample_dpmpp_2m
sampler I noticed that the timesteps that are passed to the model are slightly different from the paper.More precisely, the final timestep in
k-diffusion
is always t=0.0 where as the paper states in Appendix B.1 (see paper here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.01095.pdf):which means the smallest timestep should not be 0.
Maybe cc @crowsonkb :-)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions