Replies: 12 comments 7 replies
-
Feature request |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Feature request |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Feature request |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The politeia section on decred docs was originally written for the git backend and needs to be refactored. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Multiple choice, stakeholder polls. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Proposal filtering by domain, start/end dates, or proposal status. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Get rid of the split politeiad-politeiawww architecture and combine them into a single daemon. Once the plugins model has been added to both the record and user layer, there's not really any need for the split architecture. The default API would be a records only API, essentially what the politeiad API is now. There would be an |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
politeiad/api/v1/mime needs to be deprecated. Accepted MIME types should be a politeiad config option. politeiad/api/identity doesn't belong there either. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I've been thinking about a better way to display the proposal home page now that we have comprehensive proposal statuses. I was thinking about three tabs: Under Review - proposals being discussed and proposals being voted on. The user would have the ability to apply filtering criteria to these lists. They could filter by proposal status as well as some or all of the proposal metadata (category, dates, budget). If you come across any projects with a good UX for this kind of thing, feel free to share them. Listed below are some of the other governance websites in this space. https://vote.makerdao.com/polling |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Can we use the same key format as matrix so that matrix and politeia keys are cross compatible? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Considerations when adding a Docker image. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The politeiad identity changed between the git backend and the tlog backend, which highlight an issue with the current architecture. All of the receipts that have been saved to disk can no longer be verified without manually looking up the git backend public key and hardcoding it somwhere. Since the politeiad public key is never saved to disk anywhere, it's even possible for a sysadmin to lose it, at which point all of the receipts are useless. A better way to do this would be to turn the politeiad signatures into a plugin. It would have a public key journal that tracks the server's public key history. The API would allow the politeiad backend or other plugins to request receipts for data blobs as well as lookup what the server public key was at a specific unix time. It would be able to support multiple key types. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This discussion will serve as a general purpose feature request thread.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions