Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document how to use distinct query analyzer with Lucene #427

Open
line-o opened this issue Jan 22, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

Document how to use distinct query analyzer with Lucene #427

line-o opened this issue Jan 22, 2020 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@line-o
Copy link
Member

line-o commented Jan 22, 2020

Before eXist-db/exist#2991 - or respectively eXist-db/exist#3227 - is merged:

https://exist-db.org/exist/apps/doc/lucene, the article covering the integration of Lucene in exist-db, should be extended with a section.
It should describe one or two use-cases for having one analyzer for indexing and another to analyze the query.

@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Jan 22, 2020

Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!

@duncdrum
Copy link
Contributor

usually we add documentation before changes are merged in the main repo. The additions sound like a good idea.

@line-o line-o changed the title Extend Lucene integration doc to include how-to for https://github.com/eXist-db/exist/pull/2991 Document how to use distinct query analyzer with Lucene Jan 25, 2020
@line-o line-o self-assigned this Jan 25, 2020
@line-o
Copy link
Member Author

line-o commented Jan 25, 2020

Possible use-cases:

  • Sanskrit analyzer -> lenient mode
  • Index with WhitespaceAnalyzer, query with a Language specific one
  • Index with GermanAnalyzer without stopwords query with and without stopwords

@sten1ee
Copy link
Contributor

sten1ee commented Feb 15, 2020

Here - I've fixed you some documentation for that feature:
#445

@sten1ee
Copy link
Contributor

sten1ee commented Feb 25, 2020

The above mentioned docs PR#445 was approved and merged,
@line-o resolve this, willya?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants