Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance experience when multiple authentication methods are available #1874

Open
1 of 3 tasks
matrixbot opened this issue Sep 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
1 of 3 tasks
Labels
A-Account-Management Related to self-service account management A-Configuration Related on what is configurable and how it can be configured A-Local-Password Related to the local password database A-Login-Flow Related to the user login flow A-Upstream-OAuth Related to login via upstream OAuth 2.0 providers S-Major Major functionality / product severely impaired, no satisfactory workaround.

Comments

@matrixbot
Copy link
Collaborator

matrixbot commented Sep 9, 2024

This issue was originally created by @pmaier1 at matrix-org/matrix-authentication-service#1874.

Currently, the experience is good enough when:

  • there is only one IDP and no password auth, because the upstream IDP login happens right away
  • there is only password auth, because the user is presented with a username/login form

We need to enhance the experience when there are multiple upstream IdPs, and/or a mix of upstream IdPs and local password authentication options.

Tasks

Preview Give feedback
  1. A-Upstream-OAuth T-Enhancement
  2. 0 of 4
    A-Account-Management A-Frontend A-GraphQL A-Upstream-OAuth
@matrixbot matrixbot added A-Account-Management Related to self-service account management A-Configuration Related on what is configurable and how it can be configured A-Local-Password Related to the local password database A-Login-Flow Related to the user login flow A-Upstream-OAuth Related to login via upstream OAuth 2.0 providers S-Major Major functionality / product severely impaired, no satisfactory workaround. X-Needs-Design Needs design input labels Sep 9, 2024
@sandhose
Copy link
Member

@sandhose sandhose removed the X-Needs-Design Needs design input label Oct 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-Account-Management Related to self-service account management A-Configuration Related on what is configurable and how it can be configured A-Local-Password Related to the local password database A-Login-Flow Related to the user login flow A-Upstream-OAuth Related to login via upstream OAuth 2.0 providers S-Major Major functionality / product severely impaired, no satisfactory workaround.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants