Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Hi Andreas, I would not introduce a new class, but simply make a bugfix, as the exakt definition of the DDK level is not documented in GROOPS.
What do you think? regards |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Perfect, thank you! Cheers, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi all,
following a discussion (akvas/grates#4) on DDK-filtered spherical harmonics from ICGEM, it seems that there is some ambiguity when it comes to the filter parameters. DDK1 to DDK3 are explicitly given in Kusche et al. 2009 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-009-0308-3), which is also the basis of the GROOPS implementation of the filter (https://github.com/groops-devs/groops/blob/e96877132ebb5380845222e635499cc400020522/source/classes/sphericalHarmonicsFilter/sphericalHarmonicsFilterDdk.h#L60C3-L60C50).
ICGEM, however, uses parameters which differ from this generalised power law for DDK4 and higher, which are listed in https://github.com/strawpants/GRACE-filter/tree/master/data/DDK.
Since there is no official publication for DDK4 and higher, GROOPS I suggest that GROOPS should offer consistency with ICGEM, e.g., with a new appropriately named filter class in addition to the current flexible implementation.
Please let me know what you think.
Cheers,
Andreas
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions