You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As you can see, Schema 1 contains oneOf for Object 2 in visibleIf and is rendered without Object 2 and Schema 2 does not contain oneOf but Object 2 is rendered.
If you flip-flop in Schema 1 to e.g. Value 2 and back to Value 1, you are back at initial state but now Object 2 is visible.
This does not look like it is intended. I would create a PR but currently I do not know why there is different logic for oneOf and without oneOf because I thought this should be equivalent in my case.
It looks like the not visible element in the oneOf part triggers the setVisible method with false.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have an object
Object 2
which only should be visible if:Field 1
is equal to valueValue 1
or
Field 2
is equal to value1
.Now, add some extra:
Field 2
is only visible ifField 1
is equal toValue 2
orValue 3
.This simply means that
Object 2
is mandatory forValue 1
and is optional forValue 2
andValue 3
, which can be toggled viaField 2
.Sounds too complicated...here is a stackblitz: https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-ivy-ymrftk
As you can see,
Schema 1
containsoneOf
forObject 2
invisibleIf
and is rendered withoutObject 2
andSchema 2
does not containoneOf
butObject 2
is rendered.If you flip-flop in
Schema 1
to e.g.Value 2
and back toValue 1
, you are back at initial state but nowObject 2
is visible.This does not look like it is intended. I would create a PR but currently I do not know why there is different logic for
oneOf
and withoutoneOf
because I thought this should be equivalent in my case.It looks like the not visible element in the
oneOf
part triggers thesetVisible
method with false.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: