You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In ITM $B Alma provides the inventory number of an item. Currently this is not mapped to lobid. In context of hbz/lobid-extra-holdings#1 (comment) DE-Sol1 was requesting this.
schema.org does not have an inventory number, as far as I can see. sdo:sku seems to have an matching definition:
The Stock Keeping Unit (SKU), i.e. a merchant-specific identifier for a product or service, or the product to which the offer refers.
In
ITM $B
Alma provides the inventory number of an item. Currently this is not mapped to lobid. In context of hbz/lobid-extra-holdings#1 (comment) DE-Sol1 was requesting this.schema.org does not have an inventory number, as far as I can see.
sdo:sku
seems to have an matching definition:But is often used in the schema.org library examples for the call number. See: https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Holdings_via_Offer and
schemaorg/schemaorg#733 (comment)
Alternative http://terminology.lido-schema.org/lido00113 but not sure if this work?
Or we add our own property.
@acka47 what do you think?
We also should think about if we add the inventory date (ITM $D) and the inventory update date (ITM $Y).
maps currently to:
It should also include:
Not sure if this is correctly modeled.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: