You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The circuitv2 protocol in go-libp2p could allow for greater privacy on the ipfs network. Instead of a traditional onion router, I think the feature should be opt-in, with a tit for tat karma system. It would take the form of 12 outbound tunnels and 12 inbound tunnels that are 1 hop in length, both for seeders and leeches. If both parties choose to stay private, then the tunnels will be no more than two hops in length for the entire connection. There are many ways to do a karma system, is a karmachain that tallies the amount of data that a node has contributed to the privacy of others minus the amount of data that a node has taken from the privacy of others. Another system to do the same thing could be a distributed hash table. Such a system could be complementary to filecoin. It should be noted that I do not think that this system is urgent, but I also think that it might be necessary if IPFS is truly the wave of the future and gains mainstream adoption.
All the best,
Destroyinator
edit: My apologies, I filed this under the wrong type of issue and I am unable to change it now, sorry.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for submitting your first issue to this repository! A maintainer will be here shortly to triage and review.
In the meantime, please double-check that you have provided all the necessary information to make this process easy! Any information that can help save additional round trips is useful! We currently aim to give initial feedback within two business days. If this does not happen, feel free to leave a comment.
Please keep an eye on how this issue will be labeled, as labels give an overview of priorities, assignments and additional actions requested by the maintainers:
"Priority" labels will show how urgent this is for the team.
"Status" labels will show if this is ready to be worked on, blocked, or in progress.
"Need" labels will indicate if additional input or analysis is required.
CircuitV2 has nothing to do with privacy and isn't aim to be.
Fitting privacy on circuit v2 would be harder and less effective than a proper solution (using already existing well known software like Tor or i2p).
If you care about that we have an issues open here:
Checklist
Description
The circuitv2 protocol in go-libp2p could allow for greater privacy on the ipfs network. Instead of a traditional onion router, I think the feature should be opt-in, with a tit for tat karma system. It would take the form of 12 outbound tunnels and 12 inbound tunnels that are 1 hop in length, both for seeders and leeches. If both parties choose to stay private, then the tunnels will be no more than two hops in length for the entire connection. There are many ways to do a karma system, is a karmachain that tallies the amount of data that a node has contributed to the privacy of others minus the amount of data that a node has taken from the privacy of others. Another system to do the same thing could be a distributed hash table. Such a system could be complementary to filecoin. It should be noted that I do not think that this system is urgent, but I also think that it might be necessary if IPFS is truly the wave of the future and gains mainstream adoption.
All the best,
Destroyinator
edit: My apologies, I filed this under the wrong type of issue and I am unable to change it now, sorry.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: