You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Ranger is a fast implementation of random forests,its fast than the Breiman version. could we add an option on the randomForest related classfication,clustering,regression?
IMO, we can add an option and the "algorithm settings" tab, add it before "Training data used per tree" ,allow user choice use the Breiman or Ranger implementation of random forests
btw, I read the code and add some codes to do this , but no clues how to test the modified jaspmachinelearing module (don't want compile the whole jasp).
if someone could give some hints how to, I will submit a patch about this proposal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For more development information you can read our dev docs. feel free to ask question here.
shun2wang
changed the title
proposal of add an option choosing random forests implementation (Breiman or ranger)
[Feature Request] proposal of add an option choosing random forests implementation (Breiman or ranger)
Jan 13, 2025
Ranger is a fast implementation of random forests,its fast than the Breiman version. could we add an option on the randomForest related classfication,clustering,regression?
IMO, we can add an option and the "algorithm settings" tab, add it before "Training data used per tree" ,allow user choice use the Breiman or Ranger implementation of random forests
btw, I read the code and add some codes to do this , but no clues how to test the modified jaspmachinelearing module (don't want compile the whole jasp).
if someone could give some hints how to, I will submit a patch about this proposal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: