You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the Maester test report, one of the tests failed with the following reason:
"All Conditional Access policies are configured to exclude at least one emergency/break glass account or group."
However, upon investigation, we found that the account mentioned in the Maester test report does not exist in Entra ID. We are unsure on what basis Maester detected this Break Glass account. If it had detected the original Break Glass account, it should be present, but it is not found.
Could you please assist in understanding how Maester identifies Break Glass accounts in this case? Any guidance or clarification would be highly appreciated.
Looking forward to your support.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The issue is not with running test, issue is that output is not as expected. In test result showing there is one "Break Glass account" but in Entra this account is not exist.
Hi,
In the Maester test report, one of the tests failed with the following reason:
"All Conditional Access policies are configured to exclude at least one emergency/break glass account or group."
However, upon investigation, we found that the account mentioned in the Maester test report does not exist in Entra ID. We are unsure on what basis Maester detected this Break Glass account. If it had detected the original Break Glass account, it should be present, but it is not found.
Could you please assist in understanding how Maester identifies Break Glass accounts in this case? Any guidance or clarification would be highly appreciated.
Looking forward to your support.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: