Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude at least one emergency/break glass account or group #620

Open
iahmed18 opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Exclude at least one emergency/break glass account or group #620

iahmed18 opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@iahmed18
Copy link

Hi,

In the Maester test report, one of the tests failed with the following reason:
"All Conditional Access policies are configured to exclude at least one emergency/break glass account or group."

However, upon investigation, we found that the account mentioned in the Maester test report does not exist in Entra ID. We are unsure on what basis Maester detected this Break Glass account. If it had detected the original Break Glass account, it should be present, but it is not found.

Could you please assist in understanding how Maester identifies Break Glass accounts in this case? Any guidance or clarification would be highly appreciated.

Looking forward to your support.

image

@iahmed18
Copy link
Author

Hi Chris,

The issue is not with running test, issue is that output is not as expected. In test result showing there is one "Break Glass account" but in Entra this account is not exist.

@ChristopheLux
Copy link

Yes I understood your point but the best way to see hot it works it is to look at the code...that was my point

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants