Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How much should minisat be cleaned up? #6

Open
horenmar opened this issue Mar 20, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

How much should minisat be cleaned up? #6

horenmar opened this issue Mar 20, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@horenmar
Copy link

There are various low hanging fruit to use in improvement of MiniSat, starting from bringing in work from niklasso/minisat, through modernizing it to use C++11 (which would also allow us to stop it from forcing __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS and __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS defines) all the way through fixing up things like Minisat::Vec implementation (ATM it leaves performance on the table for no reason what-so-ever).

Which of these are worth it, and which are not?

horenmar added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2018
@horenmar
Copy link
Author

I added some integration tests to ensure that potential future changes don't break things.

horenmar added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 11, 2018
@dralley
Copy link

dralley commented Jul 30, 2019

This fork is 74 commits ahead, 68 commits behind niklasso:master. Is there any reason why those latter 68 commits were disincluded? Since this fork isn't strictly ahead of the original one, it's hard for me to judge what the differences are.

@cernoch
Copy link
Member

cernoch commented Jul 30, 2019

@dralley We started at version 2.2, which is the lastest release, widely used and at least “tested by experience”. Since there are no automated tests, I wasn't sure about the code quality of the other 68 commits.

Nevertheless, many of these changes look reasonable (e.g. niklasso@369fc3f). Please feel free to start backporting!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants