You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When we had groups, we added IRC users/rooms to that group in order for flair to work.
Nowadays we have spaces, and it feels like we're massively missing a trick by not letting users automatically group their bridged convos together based on the network they're bridged from. Can we add to spaces by default?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
IRC users were never actually added to groups, there was voodoo in Synapse which would mark users inside an appservice as part of a group for performance reasons. I think trying to join our 100,000 or so libera users to a room would cost us an arm and a leg in performance cost for little benefit.
I suspect it still has use in terms of allowing your client to organize your rooms (and, performance issues not withstanding, users) nicely into categories.
I also think that this could be useful for showing how realistic the space flairs MSC is and how well a implementation works, if it doesn't seem realistic then perhaps this comment is the better option? matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#3219 (comment) (probably should have been a thread)
If you think it's too expensive to be realistic then maybe leave a comment on the MSC
When we had groups, we added IRC users/rooms to that group in order for flair to work.
Nowadays we have spaces, and it feels like we're massively missing a trick by not letting users automatically group their bridged convos together based on the network they're bridged from. Can we add to spaces by default?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: