underestimated SFRs #77
Unanswered
getrude386
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
The estimate of the SFR would be very dependent on the assumed SFH and whether you used the best-fit or Bayesian estimates. I suspect if you adopt an SFH that does not drop to ~0, the results will be similar. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi, can you please assist with possible reasons for getting underestimated SFRs for the radio-selected galaxies. I have attached a distribution of results I got when using cigale and AGNfitter. But cigale produces underestimated SFRs for other sources i.e. they do not fall within the expected range of Whittam et al. (2022) as AGNfitter results. I have also attached my pcigale.ini file and my input data.
pcigale (1).txt
100sources_normalized_all_sources.txt
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions