You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I checked attached file (128 kbps mp3, uploaded to youtube) and this tool gave score 83, which is better, than it should be. File spectrogram has two cutoffs, one at 20khz from youtube 160k opus, and one at 16khz, from mp3. So i guess this tool detected 20khz as cutoff, and gave good score. I'm not sure if this program is designed to evaluate audio encoding quality in such cases, as it is not lossless, and it is double encoding, but if it is, I hope this report will help improving it. Youtube-Rvz4wUFo99M.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I checked attached file (128 kbps mp3, uploaded to youtube) and this tool gave score 83, which is better, than it should be. File spectrogram has two cutoffs, one at 20khz from youtube 160k opus, and one at 16khz, from mp3. So i guess this tool detected 20khz as cutoff, and gave good score. I'm not sure if this program is designed to evaluate audio encoding quality in such cases, as it is not lossless, and it is double encoding, but if it is, I hope this report will help improving it.
Youtube-Rvz4wUFo99M.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: