You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2023. It is now read-only.
When specifying split_start='after_transforms' in CV.fit(), the user defined transforms are not split up correctly. See the graph created by the fit() call in the code below.
It seems like if a user defined transform has presteps then the split location will not be in the right place. This might also effect splitting the transforms given an integer value.
Commit d5c7c82 resolves the issue with split_start='after_transforms' but it does not fix the issue when the user specifies an integer index as the split_start value.
When a transform has presteps then the integer index the user specified will not correspond to the index of the transform in the pipeline.
When specifying
split_start='after_transforms'
inCV.fit()
, the user defined transforms are not split up correctly. See the graph created by thefit()
call in the code below.It seems like if a user defined transform has presteps then the split location will not be in the right place. This might also effect splitting the transforms given an integer value.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: