You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 14, 2024. It is now read-only.
Currently, CoveringIndex data is stored as bucketed, and it just sorted within a bucket.
So it is usually less effective for filter queries compared to fully sorted data.
In addition, the index is applied when a given query has conditions only with the first indexed column.
Background and Motivation
TBD
Proposed Solution
Introduce Z-order covering index type to optimize filter query for multiple columns.
TBD
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
sezruby
added
untriaged
This is the default tag for a newly created issue
proposal
This is the default tag for a newly created design proposal
labels
Dec 9, 2021
NOTE: This is an issue for tracking Z-order covering index.
The initial implementation is ready in #495.
Problem Statement
Currently, CoveringIndex data is stored as bucketed, and it just sorted within a bucket.
So it is usually less effective for filter queries compared to fully sorted data.
In addition, the index is applied when a given query has conditions only with the first indexed column.
Background and Motivation
TBD
Proposed Solution
Introduce Z-order covering index type to optimize filter query for multiple columns.
TBD
Known/Potential Compatibility Issues
TBD
Design
TBD
Implementation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: