You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the source code, imapclient check the capability SPECIAL-USE before searching special folder attributes from the output of the command LIST non-extended. But the capability SPECIAL-USE should not be tested when searching special attributes from the non-extended LIST.
While reading the RFC 6154, I come across a line that said the SPECIAL-USE capability is mandatory with the extended LIST command, but not with the non-extended LIST command :
RFC 6154, chapter 2.0, in the first paragraph :
There is no capability string related to the support of special-use attributes on the non-extended LIST command.
With the email provider Zoho mail, folders have special folder attributes, with the output of the command LIST non-extended, but the capability SPECIAL-USE is not present. Zoho mail has a important marked share (maybe 1.58% ?) : Zoho mail market share
When the extended LIST will be implemented, the SPECIAL-USE should should be tested, but only with the extended LIST.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the source code, imapclient check the capability SPECIAL-USE before searching special folder attributes from the output of the command LIST non-extended. But the capability SPECIAL-USE should not be tested when searching special attributes from the non-extended LIST.
While reading the RFC 6154, I come across a line that said the SPECIAL-USE capability is mandatory with the extended LIST command, but not with the non-extended LIST command :
With the email provider Zoho mail, folders have special folder attributes, with the output of the command LIST non-extended, but the capability SPECIAL-USE is not present. Zoho mail has a important marked share (maybe 1.58% ?) : Zoho mail market share
When the extended LIST will be implemented, the SPECIAL-USE should should be tested, but only with the extended LIST.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: