Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 11, 2023. It is now read-only.

Feature request: U2F authentication for Lockwise in Firefox #360

Closed
mxkrn opened this issue Nov 21, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Feature request: U2F authentication for Lockwise in Firefox #360

mxkrn opened this issue Nov 21, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@mxkrn
Copy link

mxkrn commented Nov 21, 2019

After scouting Bugzilla I came to the conclusion that this would be the best place to address my concerns.

Firefox has done a great job in supporting U2F authentication for websites and web applications via the browser. However, after recently getting a U2F key from Yubikey, I found that there's no option to secure my Lockwise account with U2F, the only security is a master password. This came as a surprise because, as mentioned, Firefox already supports U2F for third-parties. In addition, most password managers support U2F authentication.

So it follows that I was wondering if this is an open topic already? If so, where can I follow any upcoming updates? If this hasn't been addressed yet, consider this as a feature request. I'm generally quite happy with the Lockwise application and would happily continue to use it, especially if I'm able to authenticate with U2F.

@mxkrn mxkrn changed the title U2F authentication for Lockwise access in browser Feature request: U2F authentication for Lockwise access in browser Nov 21, 2019
@mxkrn mxkrn changed the title Feature request: U2F authentication for Lockwise access in browser Feature request: U2F authentication for Lockwise in Firefox Nov 21, 2019
@sebschlicht
Copy link

As far as I've understand the Sync protocol, currently only username and master password (Firefox account credentials) are considered to generate the encryption key. If the login page would also consider U2F, keyfiles etc. that would increase the complexity of the user-given password a lot. So this is not an issue of the Sync protocol but the login page, right? Could it be solved by extensions, as a consequence?

@1000i100
Copy link

1000i100 commented Jun 8, 2020

#330 duplicate ?

@mnoorenberghe
Copy link
Contributor

This is about protecting local logins with 2FA (which would only be pseudo-security) but I assume that issue is about usage on websites. Unfortunately the summary there is unclear.

@mxkrn
Copy link
Author

mxkrn commented Jun 16, 2020

#330 duplicate ?

True. I didn't know Fido2 was the underlying technology for U2F.

Will close this.

@mxkrn mxkrn closed this as completed Jun 16, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants