You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When handling many multiaddrs that have common prefixes, or sections, it has been discussed that it may be useful to have a format for expressing these as combinations, or DAGs. This is to allow much more compressed transmissions, and even in-memory representations.
Found this digging through IRC: these multiaddr combinations could be used as a language for expressing e.g. dial restrictions.
<lgierth> jbenet-on-plane: coming up with compressed multiaddr combinations as a language for expressing dialing restrictions? e.g. for tor
<jbenet-on-plane> lgierth: oh wow yeah good idea
<jbenet-on-plane> lgierth: hm seems to be a pretty useful primitive
<jbenet-on-plane> MultiaddrSet or something?
When handling many multiaddrs that have common prefixes, or sections, it has been discussed that it may be useful to have a format for expressing these as combinations, or DAGs. This is to allow much more compressed transmissions, and even in-memory representations.
For example, the list:
OR-Lists
It is an expansion of the combinations
This notation could be much more compressed way to represent these than the full list.
DAGs
Another such representation could treat it like a dag:
This one could also be very compressed, and allow representing much more versatile lists.
Some open problems with this:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: