You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the pipeline requires a list of FASTQs and a list of read structures, where the order matters. Could we consider more explicit alternatives that could be added in addition to the current way to specify them?
E.g. eExplicitly named fastq/read-structure pairs. We could use names like R1, R2, I1(i7), and I2(i5)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description of feature
See original discussion: #38 (comment)
Currently the pipeline requires a list of FASTQs and a list of read structures, where the order matters. Could we consider more explicit alternatives that could be added in addition to the current way to specify them?
E.g. eExplicitly named fastq/read-structure pairs. We could use names like R1, R2, I1(i7), and I2(i5)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: