How well does this model compare to stable-cascade? #97
JohnnyRacer
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
This looks like an awesome and very promising project to train cheaper diffusion models. However, it seems like stable-cascade is still vastly more popular and widely used. Are there any apples-to-apples performance/speed/quality comparisons on the
PixArt
models compared tostable-cascade
? It seems like both of these projects are trying to solve the same problem of training scalability, so it would be helpful to have some reproducible metrics between these two models. All of the examples shown in bothstable-cascade
andPixArt
shown seem to be quite cherry-picked so its hard to compare directly.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions