You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In this paper, I present a novel quasi-rotation invariant interest point descriptor, coined COIF (Concentric Oval Intensity Features). The descriptor is straightforward to implement and feature matching is time efficient. COIF may be used to detect rotated images and may be used for image stitching in panorama applications. COIF demonstrates the feasibility of using luminance histograms for feature matching.
General Comparison
Description
SIFT
COIF
Instances Equal
55
55
SIFT Better
11
-
COIF Better
-
8
Accuracy (%)
98.9589
98.5205
More Accurate (%)
+0.4384
-
Detailed Accuracy Distribution
COIFv6
Accuracy Range
Count
100%
60
99-95%
6
94-90%
4
89-85%
0
84-80%
3
SIFT
Accuracy Range
Count
100%
65
99-95%
4
94-90%
1
89-85%
2
84-80%
0
79-75%
1
Image Stitching Dataset Performance
Dataset
COIFv6 Success
COIFv6 Failure
SIFT Success
SIFT Failure
COIFv6 vs. SIFT
SPW Dataset (2020)
88.373%
11.627%
95.455%
4.545%
-7.082%
Dataset for Stitching with Multiple Registrations (2018)
65.286%
35.714%
50.000%
50.000%
+15.286%
VPG Dataset (2020)
90.910%
9.090%
44.455%
54.545%
+46.455%
Impact of Environmental Factors on Measurement Accuracy
Effect
Accuracy Range
Light Variation
+/- 10%
Perspective Transformation
25%
Scale Change
+/- 20%
Guassian Blur
+3 pixel radius
Performance Metrics and Distribution Statistics for Image Matching Operations
Average Matching Time
Median Matching Time
Image Pair Count
Pixels Processed Count
4,283 milliseconds
1,985 milliseconds
45
25,543,680
Performance Metrics and Distribution Statistics for COIFv6 Upright (Minimal Image Rotation)
Average Matching Time
Median Matching Time
Image Pair Count
Pixels Processed Count
3,778 milliseconds
1,577 milliseconds
45
25,543,680
Matching times include time to identify corners, time to generate descriptors, and time for feature matching.
Bin Merge Count
Number of Times Used
Percent Occurrence
1
38
69.09%
2
3
5.45%
3
4
7.27%
4
5
9.09%
5
5
9.09%
Detailed Analysis of Iteration Counts by Bin Merge
Bin Merge Count
Iteration
Count
Percent Occurrence
1
1
66
51.96%
2
1
16
12.59%
3
1
11
8.66%
4
1
11
8.66%
4
2
1
0.78%
4
6
1
0.78%
5
1
7
5.51%
5
2
2
1.57%
5
4
1
0.78%
5
5
1
0.78%
5
7
2
1.57%
5
8
1
0.78%
5
9
7
5.51%
Given the test image pair set, 51.96% of all image pairs yielded passing feature matches with the default COIFv6 parameters.
Given the test image pair set, 87.38% of all image pairs yielded passing feature matches within the first 5 iterations.