From b74b691640f98ff9c547e57d5d773c9781f924be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Matthew \"strager\" Glazar" <strager.nds@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 23:31:14 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] fix(website): change 130x faster claim to match benchmarks

Our benchmarks now claim that quick-lint-js is only ~117.7x faster
than ESLint. Update the marketing on the home page accordingly to
avoid being dishonest.
---
 website/public/index.ejs.html | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/website/public/index.ejs.html b/website/public/index.ejs.html
index cd8550c6c7..569b0feb7b 100755
--- a/website/public/index.ejs.html
+++ b/website/public/index.ejs.html
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@
 
     <main>
       <p>
-        <a href="benchmarks/">Over <strong>130× faster</strong> than ESLint</a>,
+        <a href="benchmarks/">Over <strong>90× faster</strong> than ESLint</a>,
         quick-lint-js gives you <strong>instant feedback</strong> as you code.
         <strong>Find bugs</strong> in your JavaScript before your finger leaves
         the keyboard. Lint any JavaScript file with