Question about Exchange Spec.Name vs. ObjectMeta.Name #2931
-
Is this field: Different from Exchange.ObjectMeta.Name? If not, just curious if it's needed as it seems redundant. If it is, how does it handle collisions if two CRs create an exchange with different k8s name but use the same Spec.Name field? Thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
@ChunyiLyu @MirahImage this was started here because messaging topology Operator does not have Discussions enabled |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@vaikas may I ask you to move this to the message topology Operator repo? https://github.com/rabbitmq/messaging-topology-operator/discussions |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@vaikas may I ask you to move this to the message topology Operator repo? https://github.com/rabbitmq/messaging-topology-operator/discussions