Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up dust delegations / forced undelegation #6

Open
przemyslaw opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Clean up dust delegations / forced undelegation #6

przemyslaw opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@przemyslaw
Copy link
Collaborator

przemyslaw commented Feb 5, 2024

t should be a configurable option - what is dust for the validator? Then, for instance, if less than 100 CSPR are sitting for more than three months without any change, undelegate it.

The catch with this is "dust" means what? Big accounts can leave big dust. So, it can be tricky not to have this happen. Some large accounts are 2k+ CSPR per era. So, the formula might need

x% of undelegate amount left or < 500 CSPR, which is greater. Or if the amount left is equal to the last rewards +/- certain percent, then call dust.

Forced undelegation - whether the validator should be allowed to trigger the undelegation process. The dust config option could be used here on the generic level. There could also be a targeted undelegation option.

Adding limits and undelegating those below or above the limits solves this task.

@przemyslaw przemyslaw added the dust label Feb 5, 2024
moubctez pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2024
@wojcik91
Copy link

Forced undelegation of stakes below/above specified delegation limits has been implemented as part of #4.

Does that fulfill this requirement?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants