Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Training with MMPD #352

Open
znygithub opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Training with MMPD #352

znygithub opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@znygithub
Copy link

znygithub commented Jan 16, 2025

Why are both DiffNormalized and Standardized during preprocessing when using MMPD as the training set?

@yahskapar
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @znygithub,

This is something specific to the neural method you're using (e.g., TS-CAN) than the dataset - we typically adopted whatever the defaults in the provided configs are for fairer comparisons in our NeurIPS 2023 Datasets and Benchmarks paper.

@yahskapar yahskapar self-assigned this Jan 16, 2025
@znygithub
Copy link
Author

Okay, thank you for your answer. I have reviewed the data processing for each model.

I found the processing of EfficientPhys to be quite strange. In YAML SETTING, video is standardized, but the labels are diff-normalized. Wouldn't this cause misalignment between the video and labels? I checked the PhysNet model code, and it seems that the model itself does not perform diff-normalization internally.

Thanks for your answer

DATA_TYPE: ['Standardized'],LABEL_TYPE: DiffNormalized

@yahskapar
Copy link
Collaborator

@znygithub,

That all sounds expected - EfficientPhys has a normalization module internally (pictured below) that effectively avoids any misalignment that you're suggesting.

Image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants