You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current text (sectioning and wording) seems to suggest that other types of timelines than document timelines can be associated with a document:
4.3 Timelines
[...]
A timeline can be associated with a document.
4.3.1 Document timelines
A document timeline is a type of timeline associated with a document and whose current time is calculated [...] each time the update animations and send events procedure is run.
But I cannot find any exemple of this.
(1) I would say that any timeline associated with a document should be a document timeline, like the potential subclass mentioned in #5420. If I am correct, I think it would be more appropriate to remove the first paragraph above and move the definition of associated with a document in the next sub-section.
(2) Relatedly, I cannot find where a document timeline is not associated with a document, so I do not see the point of defining associated with a document. If it cannot happen and I am correct in (1), I think it would be clearer to replace associated with a document with document timeline in the procedures checking this condition.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(3) I cannot find an exemple of a document timeline that is not the default document timeline. I think it would be useful to clarify the reason of this distinction. My best guess is that this anticipates the need for multiple timelines in the document (like in a video editor).
Yes, the flexibility here is mostly anticipating the SVG use case. I think
the simplifications would be ok, however.
Regarding (3), if you create a `DocumentTimeline` via the constructor, it
is not the default document timeline.
Message ID: ***@***.***>
The current text (sectioning and wording) seems to suggest that other types of timelines than document timelines can be associated with a document:
But I cannot find any exemple of this.
(1) I would say that any timeline associated with a document should be a document timeline, like the potential subclass mentioned in #5420. If I am correct, I think it would be more appropriate to remove the first paragraph above and move the definition of associated with a document in the next sub-section.
(2) Relatedly, I cannot find where a document timeline is not associated with a document, so I do not see the point of defining associated with a document. If it cannot happen and I am correct in (1), I think it would be clearer to replace associated with a document with document timeline in the procedures checking this condition.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: