Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should the network be returned in the resolutionResults object? #52

Open
kdenhartog opened this issue Nov 25, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Should the network be returned in the resolutionResults object? #52

kdenhartog opened this issue Nov 25, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kdenhartog
Copy link
Member

Would it be useful for the resolver to return metadata about the network that's included in the identifier. Our current thinking is that if the identifier contains a network in the method specific identifier (this syntax could also likely be used in ways other than indicating a specific network) then the resolver should return metadata about the network used.

@peacekeeper
Copy link
Collaborator

Sounds like a good idea! This could be included in the "methodMetadata" object. We could add a comment to the spec that explains this.

@peacekeeper peacekeeper added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 29, 2024
@pchampin
Copy link
Collaborator

This was discussed during the did meeting on 23 January 2025.

View the transcript

w3c/did-resolution#52

JoeAndrieu: Think it is out of scope. DIDDoc is about getting the canonical DIDDoc. Can get other things already. What you can't infer is that the JWKS are canonical. Going to confuse the security model.

Wip: Could be an extension.

markus_sabadello: Could be useful as metadata properties. Concept of "network" (namespaces within a method) is not in the DID Core -- is used by some Methods. Could be useful to return other information. I think this is an extension.

manu: +1 to extension.

<JoeAndrieu> +1 to extension. seems useful for some methods


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants