Replies: 1 comment
-
Thanks a lot for the great feedback @comods . It's true that packages have been not getting a lot of love since uniting the both websites. We'll work on those things in the coming quarter, please stay tuned and keep the feedback coming. It helps us immensely |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
wapm.io was great, worked, simple, and ran embedded runtimes.
wasmer.io is way worse, broken, confusing, ugly, and unusable.
Where is the mobile type-able url that takes you to a clean package search? Used to be wapm.io (7 chars) and now there isn't one.
It looks and runs like it was made by an outdated AI prompt:
Your CLI tools are great, just please give us a working website, like wapm.io was.
Focus on getting traffic to packages or no one has a use for wasmer.io/explore.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions