We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Would it make sense to add URL as an acceptable reference type for the https://www.wikipathways.org/WikiPathwaysCurator/ReferencesTests/atLeastOneReference test? Adding it here, although maybe we should discuss this since a URL is quite different from DOI, ISBN and PubMed.
Many pathways (a lot of the yeast pathways at least) have only one reference for either YeastPathways or BioCyc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Would it make sense to add URL as an acceptable reference type for the https://www.wikipathways.org/WikiPathwaysCurator/ReferencesTests/atLeastOneReference test? Adding it here, although maybe we should discuss this since a URL is quite different from DOI, ISBN and PubMed.
Many pathways (a lot of the yeast pathways at least) have only one reference for either YeastPathways or BioCyc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: